My friend and colleague Charlie, Dr. Charles Vanover, a tenured professor at University of South Florida [USF] in the College of Education, Educational Leadership, whose true love is qualitative arts-based research, calls me up as says “Hey, can I bring lunch this Saturday.” Since that’s how he usually starts his pitches, I bet myself a thousand bucks, he wanted me to serve as editor on something he was working on. He shows up at my door out at the beach cottage, lunch in hand, and “Michelle and I really need you, Trace. We need your expertise on this. Come on.” He’s buttering me up knowing I know that’s what he’s doing. Michelle is the host and interviewer for the project and a good friend and doctoral peer whom I love and respect. Knowing how bogged down I am, and smiling, He says, “We’re a team, the three of us,” and asks if I would be willing to be the master editor on a beast of a film project for his and Michelle’s ICQI symposium on the new book he, Paul Mihas, and Johnny Saldaña were doing at the behest of Sage Publishing. It was to be used as a prelaunch marketing campaign for their new book, Analyzing and Interpreting Qualitative Research: After the Interview. And here I thought the deadline for Chicago BUTOH was unrealistic. I had three weeks to get this behemoth in and out.

Again, the biggest challenge was cleaning it up and shortening it to a reasonable amount of time without altering the voices or stories of the storyteller in order to maintain the integrity of the qualitative capture. Plus, there was the copy to be written and edited, the group section discussions to be produced and edited, all the time codes to be marked and noted, and the production of each speaker/presenter as independent stand-alone sections separate from the one full-feature film. A secondary challenge was the fact that the entire thing was done on Zoom without all the contributors being mindful of camera quality, lighting, audio quality, ambient sound, etc. and with international connectivity issues. This leant a shocking level of detail correction and work-arounds that would blow any film editor’s mind, but, with zero sleep and dogged determination, we met the deadline while also meeting my other deadlines for my own ICQI presentation, two curriculum writings, two educational field program designs, my doctoral course work, and much more. In the end, looking at the final cuts and seeing the entire team’s elation over the project’s completion and at the final products’ outcomes, It was all worth it. I got to collaborate with some very creative and innovative beings, exchanging experiences and knowledge. I always love it when Charlie calls and asks if he can bring lunch on a Saturday.

Dr. Elaine Keane

Chapter 15: Critical Analytic Memoing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9S70770Iuk

Dr. Elaine Keane discusses the use of analytic memos in qualitative research as a tool to bring a sharp and incisive edge to critical inquiry. Dr. Keane’s chapter provides examples of memos at different stages of the constructivist grounded theory process and it traces the development and evolution of a complex conceptual inquiry. Dr. Keane describes how memos produce and generate the ideas shaping inquiry and provides step-by-step instructions. Critical analytic memoing helps researchers move from descriptive summaries of codes and categories to abstract, conceptualizing forms of writing. Memos are tools for writing thoughts as they happen and they help researchers play with ideas and concepts from the analysis.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9S70770Iuk

Dr. Adrian Larbi-Cherif, Cori Egan, & Dr. Joshua L. Glazer

Chapter 17: Emergent Analysis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgINIP7smEs

The research team discusses their efforts to investigate the Tennessee iZone, a district-led effort to dramatically improve, or “turn around,” 23 of its lowest performing schools. As the research team studied 150+ interviews conducted with leaders and across the district, they discovered their emergent findings did not fit the original research questions. In their chapter, the research team describes how they reanalyzed these data. They discus how they developed new research questions, created a purposeful sample of the original 150+ interviews, recoded the material, and produced a new analysis, without losing methodological rigor. The video concludes with advice to beginning researchers to use formal qualitative methods to learn what the data say, rather than writing up first impressions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgINIP7smEs

Dr. Daniel Turner

Chapter 7: Coding System Design and Management
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WX6ffUtsf_0

In this interview, Dr. Turner discusses how his chapter is intended to help qualitative researchers manage the coding process and order and structure their data. The chapter emphasizes the importance planning ahead and carefully managing the coding process. It provides practical tips for coding that are relevant to a broad range of approaches to qualitative data analysis. The chapter also discusses the benefits and challenges of collaborating for qualitative data analysis and leading a team of analysts Dr. Turner’s Bio Daniel Turner started as a qualitative researcher in health, healthcare delivery, and long-term conditions, and he engaged in collaborations with national bodies and universities across the UK. He left academia in 2014 to start up Quirkos, when he found an unmet need for simple and reliable qualitative analysis software. He is founder and director of Quirkos and writes a popular blog on qualitative methods.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WX6ffUtsf_0

Dr. Mariaelena Bartesaghi

Chapter 5: Theories and Practices of Transcription from Discourse AnalysisV2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RocfzEmjPRE

Dr. Mariaelena Bartesaghi describes the practice transcription in discourse analysis. Her chapter discusses how to use the symbols of conversation analysis to transcribe the messiness and fluidity of real speech. In discourse analysis, transcription is highly theorized. Conversation analysis creates gives researchers tools to develop transcripts that communicate the complexity of people’s speech and produce evidence other researchers may examine and contextualize from a wide range of theoretical perspectives. Dr. Bartesaghi emphasizes this empirical evidence may be used to defend and falsify claims about the meanings shared as people speak and act.
Mariaelena Bartesaghi is Associate Professor of Communication at The University of South Florida. She studies institutionalization, or how social discourses of authority can be traced in spoken and written discourse. Her research on therapy, psychiatry, crisis settings, academia, and qualitative research as practice has been published in journals such as Discourse Studies, Management Communication Quarterly, Communication Studies, The Review of Communication, Communication & Medicine and Language under Discussion. She is the Editor in Chief of Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RocfzEmjPRE

Dr.

Chapter

—–,

Dr.

Chapter

—–,

Peer Review Sessions for ICQI (International Conference of Qualitative Inquiry), Friday May 21st, 2021

Analyzing and Interpreting Qualitative Research, After the Interview: Section 1- Preparing for Data Collection and Engaging in Interpretation, (ICQI), Friday May 21st, 2021
This is an edited zoom video of the first peer reviewed session put up by the co-editors of Analyzing and Interpreting Qualitative Research: After the Interview at the International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry (ICQI), on Friday May 21st, 2021
04:12 Michelle Angelo-Rocha 18:20 Sheryl L. Chatfield 34:57 Sally Campbell Galman 52:00 Paul Mihas

Analyzing and Interpreting Qualitative Research, After the Interview, Peer Review Session: Section 2- Interpretation and Writing Strategies, (ICQI), Friday May 21st, 2021
02:43 Paul Mihas 12:51 Elaine Keane 31:27 Jaime Leigh Fiddler 45:00 Johnny Saldaña, Discussant 50:10 General Discussion

Analyzing and Interpreting Qualitative Research, After the Interview, Peer Review Session: Section 3- Strategies for Coding and Categorizing Data, (ICQI), Friday May 21st, 2021
00:00 Introduction 02:07 Daniel Turner 15:01 Andrea J. Bingham & Patricia Witkowsky 27:21 Elsa M. Gonzalez & Yvonna S. Lincoln 45:46 Discussant Paul Mihas

Analyzing and Interpreting Qualitative Research, After the Interview, Peer Review Session: Section 4- Performance and Writing Strategies, (ICQI), Friday May 21st, 2021
02:27 Jessica Gullion 14:26 Johnny Saldaña 27:41 Aishath Nasheeda 40:25 Mitch Allen & Sophie Tomas 104:38 Discussant Helen Salmon

Leave a comment